Legal Opinion

P. David Newsome v. Culp (In Re Fitzgerald, De Arman & Roberts, Inc.)

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided July 16, 1991No. 18-12514PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

MICKEY DAN WILSON, Bankruptcy Judge.

Upon consideration of the record in the above-styled adversary proceeding, and in Case No. 88-01859-W In re Fitzgerald, De Arman & Roberts, Inc., the Court determines, concludes and orders as follows.

On June 28, 1988, the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (“SIPC”) filed its application for a protective decree, com mencing Case No. 88-C-601-C, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Fitzgerald, De Arman & Roberts, Inc., in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma. On the same day,…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Langley v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Securities Investor Protection Corp. v. BarbourSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Deitrick v. GreaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1940

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mishkin Ex Rel. Liquidation of the Business of Adler, Coleman Clearing Corp. v. Ensminger (In Re Adler, Coleman Clearing Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1999
  2. Newsome v. Culp (In Re Culp)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1992
  3. Langenkamp v. McKinney (In Re McKinney)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API