Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re the Arbitration between Bobak & AIG Claims Services, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 6, 2012Published

1DissentCarni, J.

I concur with the conclusion of my colleagues that the interest of judicial economy is served by deeming the factual findings made by Supreme Court in the order *1105entered upon remittal in Matter of New Hampshire Ins. Co. (Bobak) (72 AD3d 1647 [2010]) to be applicable to this appeal. I further concur with the conclusion of my colleagues that petitioner’s contention that the court erred in failing to join Travelers Insurance Company (Travelers) and Ohio Insurance Guaranty Association as necessary parties is not properly before us.

I disagree, however, with the conclusion of my colleagues that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In re the Arbitration between Matarasso & Continental Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Mass v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  3. American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. MorganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  4. Federal Insurance v. ReingoldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. RothAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API