Legal Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Mezacapa

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 2004No. 2003-1809PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, Victor Anthony Mezacapa III of Cleveland, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0052023, was admitted to the Ohio bar in 1991. On April 14, 2003, relator, Disciplinary Counsel, filed a complaint charging respondent with violations of the Code of Professional Responsibility. A panel of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline considered the cause on the parties’ consent-to-discipline agreement, which included a joint recitation of the facts, admitted misconduct, and suggested sanction.

{¶ 2} The parties agreed that a client had retained respondent in or around June…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. ThomasOhio Supreme Court · 2001

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. PullinsOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. WilsonOhio Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Warren County Bar Association v. CliftonOhio Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Columbus Bar Association v. Chodosh.Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. FlowersOhio Supreme Court · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API