Legal Opinion

Patterson v. Ingraham

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1851PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In error from the southern district chancery court; Hon. James M. Smiley, chancellor. The opinion of the court contains a sufficient statement of the facts of the case.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clayton

The- single point in this case, is, whether after a decree for the complainants, founded up'on a pro confesso order regularly taken, the defendant, upon appeal to this court, may take advantage of the statute of limitations, if it appear upon the face of the bill, that the time prescribed by the statute as a bar has elapsed. It is insisted for the appellant that this may be done, because it might be done upon a demurrer to the bill. That they are both but modes of admitting the facts charged. ■

We do not think the analogy holds good. Upon a demurrer, the party asserts all his legal rights, and…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Davis v. BARR, STATE TAX COMM.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Wilkinson v. FlowersMississippi Supreme Court · 1859
  3. Gardner v. DuncanMississippi Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Clark v. Trustees of Jefferson CollegeMississippi Supreme Court · 1881

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API