Carlin v. Paul
Supreme Court of Missouri
T. Polk, for Plaintiff in error. Primm & Whittelsey, for Defendants in error.
1Opinion of the CourtNaptqn, J.
This was an action on the case for a disturbance of a right of way in an alley in the city of St. Louis. The declaration contained two counts; the one alleging a private right of way in the plaintiff, and the other avering that the alley was a public highway. The case went to trial upon the general issue, and it was agreed that, in case of a recovery, the plaintiff should have only nominal damages — such damages to be considered bQth special and general.
It appeared that Madame Therese Cerre Chouteau formerly owned the entire block, through which the supposed alley extended, and that shortly…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Winslow v. SauerweinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1955
- Dawson v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1870
- Larkin v. KieselmannSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
- Taylor v. DychesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1882
- Anderton v. GageMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987