Legal Opinion

Faulk v. Faulk

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 5, 1938No. 1845PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DORE, Judge.

On February 18, 1893, Erastus and John (Jean) Faulk, acquired jointly the following described tract of land: “One certain tract of woodland situated in the Parish of Vermillion on the west side of the Bayou Vermillion and west of Coulee Kinney, bounded North by Ben Faulk, south by Joseph W. Harrington, East by present vendor (Seven-ne Hebert) and west by Antoine Gray, containing eight arpents, more or less.”

This is a suit by the heirs of John (Jean) Faulk against the widow and heirs of said Erastus Faulk for a partition by licitation of four arpents of the said tract of land,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fox v. Succession of BroussardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
  2. Milburn v. WempleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
  3. Chaumont Oil Co. v. Le BlancSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
  4. Griffith v. First Nat. Bank of GuntersvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  5. Bach v. BallardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1858

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Succession of SkyeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
  2. Braxton v. GuilloryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. Shell Oil Co. v. HebertLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API