Legal Opinion
Peterson v. Federal Mining & Smelting Co.
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided July 2, 1946No. 7294PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BUDGE, Justice.
This appeal is from an award of the Industrial Accident Board in favor of claimant, from which defendant appealed. The material facts, as stipulated, are substantially as follows:
“The Federal Mining and Smelting Company [appellant] is now and for many years prior hereto has been engaged in the mining of metalliferous ores, * * * Shoshone County,
“Edward Peterson was on the first day of May, 1945, and for more than ten (10) years prior thereto, has been in the employ of the Federal Mining and Smelting Company in its flotation mill at the Morning Mine at Mullan * * * during at…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Michigan Central Railroad v. VreelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Industrial Commission v. KamrathOhio Supreme Court · 1928
- State ex rel. Carlson v. District Court of Hennepin CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Warner v. ZaiserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Donoho v. Atlantic Basin Iron WorksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Booker v. Duke Medical CenterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Frisbie v. Sunshine Mining CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
- Tucker v. in Death of GonzalesColorado Court of Appeals · 1975
- McAllister v. Bd. of Ed., KearnyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
- Cline v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1971
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.