Legal Opinion

City of Hartford v. Tucker

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided May 31, 1988No. 5668PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtFoti, J.

The defendant appeals from a judgment rendered in part for the plaintiff following a jury trial. The defendant claims that the court erred (1) in directing a verdict for the plaintiff on one count of the defendant’s counterclaim for failure to state a cause of action, and (2) in improperly instructing the jury on the second count. We find no. error.

This action was originated by the plaintiff city of Hartford (city) to collect taxes and interest allegedly due on certain real and personal property owned by *517the defendant, Stanley Tucker. The parties entered into a stipulation, pursuant to which…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kegel v. McNeelyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1984
  2. Bray v. Town of WallingfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1850
  3. Prudential Mortgage & Investment Co. v. City of New BritainSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tucker v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API