Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Zachary T. Krogman
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Per curiam
¶ 1. We review a stipulation pursuant to Supreme Court Rule (SCR) 22.12 between the Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) and Attorney Zachary T. Krogman. In the stipulation, Attorney Krogman agrees with the OLR's position that his misconduct warrants the imposition of a four-month suspension of his license to practice law in Wisconsin. Attorney Krogman also agrees with the OLR's position that certain conditions should be imposed upon the reinstatement of his license to practice law in Wisconsin.
¶ 2. After fully reviewing the stipulation and the facts of this matter, we accept the stipulation and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Disciplinary Proceedings Against SmeadWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
- In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against TobinWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
3Cited by10 opinions
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Raymond M. ClarkWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Eric L. CrandallWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Eric L. CrandallWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Gerald P. BoyleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Gerald P. BoyleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.