Legal Opinion

Keller v. Loews Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 12, 2010PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff alleges religious discrimination in the termination of his employment as in-house attorney with defendant Loews Corporation. Defendant’s counterclaim alleges that plaintiff breached his fiduciary duty to Loews by disclosing confidential information in his complaint. The motion court dismissed the counterclaim on the ground that there is no fiduciary relationship between an employer and an at-will employee. That was error.

“[A] lawyer, as one in a confidential relationship and as any fiduciary, is charged with a high degree of undivided loyalty to his client” (Matter of Kelly, 23 NY2d…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re KellyNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. Sage Realty Corp. v. Proskauer Rose Goetz & Mendelsohn LLPNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Nesenoff v. Dinerstein & Lesser, P.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Napoli v. New York PostAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API