Legal Opinion

Neely v. Miller Brewing Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 9, 2002No. 00-3884PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MERRITT, Circuit Judge.

This case concerns a settlement agreement in an employment discrimination dispute that stated that the settlement was subject to Older Worker Benefit Protection Act timings. The “timing” provisions under this Act give a settling party time to reconsider and withdraw from a settlement before it becomes irrevocable.1 Plaintiff Theresa Neely contends that this “timings” clause in the agreement gave her the right to withdraw from the agreement. The court below agreed with her employer, Miller Brewing Company, that the settlement agreement was final and binding, without any…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bamerilease Capital Corp. v. Eugene E. NearburgCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
  2. Campbell v. Potash Corp. of Saskatchewan, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  3. Diversified Energy, Inc.,plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Tennessee Valley Authority, Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kentucky Laborers' District Council Health & Welfare Fund, et al. v. Thalle Construction Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2026
  2. McDermott v. City of North OlmstedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  3. McDermott v. City of North OlmstedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  4. McDermott v. City of North OlmstedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API