Legal Opinion
Farngiamore v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided March 18, 1994No. 94-182PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
633 So.2d 118 (1994)
Gary R. FARNGIAMORE, Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. 94-182.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
March 18, 1994.
Gary R. Farngiamore, pro se.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Wesley Heidt, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for respondent.
2Per curiam
Petitioner claims he did not receive a copy of the order denying his Rule 3.850 motion. The record reflects that the certificate of the clerk of court did not comply with the requirements of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850(g). Accordingly, the petition for writ of habeas corpus for…
3Cited by3 opinions
- Jones v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Guzman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Miller v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996