Legal Opinion

American Petrofina, Inc. v. Allen

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1994No. D-3099PublishedCited by 134 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoggett, Justice

In this cause we consider a contention that fraudulent concealment tolls the statute of limitations and review the effect of omitting a previously named party from a subsequent pleading.

I

This suit involves wrongful death and survival claims by numerous plaintiffs against numerous defendants (collectively, “Petrofi-na”). 1 Petrofina moved for partial summary judgment against 39 plaintiffs on the basis of the two-year statute of limitations for such actions. 2 Plaintiffs responded that the statute of limitations was tolled until they discovered or should have discovered the fraud and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Moreno v. Sterling Drug, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Willis v. MaverickTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Woods v. William M. Mercer, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by134 opinions

  1. KPMG Peat Marwick v. Harrison County Housing Finance Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Ryland Group, Inc. v. HoodTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  3. S.V. v. R.V.Texas Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Earle v. RatliffTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Woodruff v. Wright, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2001

129 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API