Legal Opinion

Lee v. Swanson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1937No. 26691. Department OnePublished

1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.

This action was instituted by James F. Lee and W. S. Saunders to recover on two promissory notes of N. Arthur Nelson, each for $950, one payable to each plaintiff, and to foreclose a chattel mortgage on certain hotel furniture and equipment, executed by Nelson to secure the payment of the two notes.

N. Arthur Nelson, C. O. Swanson and wife, Charles H. Swanson, and Carl O. Swanson, were made parties defendant. An order of default for failure to answer was entered against all of the defendants except Nelson, on whom the plaintiffs were not able to obtain service because of his absence from the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gleason v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Weir v. RathbunWashington Supreme Court · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API