Legal Opinion

Neda v. Fontenot

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided August 15, 1847PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of St. Landry, Overton, J.

1Opinion of the Court

rphe judgment of the court was pronounced by

Rost, J.

The administrator of the succession of Garrigues Flavjac, believing the solvency of the succession to be doubtful, caused a meeting of its creditor’s to be held before a notary public, to deliberate and decide upon the terms and conditions of the sale of the property left by the deceased. The pi’oceediugs were kept open eleven days by the notary, and during their continuance two of the present defendants, representing themselves to bo mortgage creditors to the amount of about thirty thousand dollars, exercised their regal right to require a…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fontenot v. FontenotSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
  2. Lowenberg, Marks & Co. v. H. & C. Newman, Ltd.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1918
  3. Hardy v. PecotSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
  4. Bank of Berwick v. George Vinson Shingle & Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API