Legal Opinion

King v. Milazzo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 15, 1989No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and motion denied. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in granting defendant Hopkins further discovery. By demanding that plaintiffs file a note of issue defendant was no longer entitled to further deposition (see, CPLR 3216; Wolanin v Halliman, 145 AD2d 967, 968; Gray v Crouse-Irving Mem. Hosp., 107 AD2d 1038). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Gossel, J. — discovery.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Boomer, Green, Pine and Balio, JJ.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gray v. Crouse-Irving Memorial Hospital, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  2. Wolanin v. HallimanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Witmer v. BiehlsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Darko v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 2006
  3. King v. MilazzoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989