Legal Opinion

Knight v. Princess Builders, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 17, 2006No. 67, September Term, 2005PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBattaglia, J.

The case sub judice presents us with two issues for our resolution. The first question presented is whether a company, Princess Builders, Inc. that entered into a contract to purchase real property from the Personal Representative of an intestate estate, may pursue an appeal from an Orphans’ Court’s order directing the Personal Representative to sell the real property to one of the Estate’s heirs, Diana Knight. We hold that Princess Builders is properly considered a “party” under Maryland Code (1974, 2002 Repl.Vol.), Section 12-502 of the Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article governing such…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Cecil v. CecilCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1862
  2. Meyer v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1899
  3. Himmighoefer v. Medallion Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  4. Rome v. LowenthalCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  5. Watson v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Standard Fire Insurance v. BerrettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  2. Washington Mutual Bank v. HomanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  3. Standard Fire Insurance v. BerrettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API