Legal Opinion

Richmond Traction Co. v. Martin's Administrator

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided December 9, 1903PublishedCited by 31 opinions

Error to a judgment of tile Law and Equity Court of the city of Richmond, in an action of trespass on the case, wherein the defendant in error was the plaintiff, and the plaintiff in error was the defendant.

1Opinion of the CourtWhittle, J.

About 10 o’clock on the night of December 24, 1900, Walter Martin, whose administratrix is the defendant in error here, while in an intoxicated condition, started from the southwest corner of Seventh and Broad streets, in the city of Richmond, diagonally across Broad street, in a northwesterly direction, for the purpose of taking a mule car to go to his home, on Barton Heights. In crossing the street he had to pass over the double track of the plaintiff in error, the Richmond Traction Company. He crossed the first track in safety, but at the second track, not at a crossing, but between Sixth…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rider v. Syracuse Rapid Transit Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1902

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Black v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford Railroad Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  2. Indianapolis Traction & Terminal Co. v. KiddIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Southern Railway Co. v. BaileySupreme Court of Virginia · 1910
  4. Yeary v. HolbrookSupreme Court of Virginia · 1938
  5. Consumers' Brewing Co. v. Doyle's AdministratrixSupreme Court of Virginia · 1904

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API