Legal Opinion

In re Universal Access, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Texas

Decided August 8, 2002No. Civ.A. 9:02-CV-103-JHPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

HANNAH, Chief Judge.

AMENDED ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES, APPOINTING LEAD PLAINTIFFS, AND APPROVING SELECTION OF LEAD AND LIAISON COUNSEL

Before the Court are the competing Motions of the Frandsen Group and the Louie Group for Consolidation, Appointment as Lead Plaintiff and Approval of Selection of Lead and Liaison Counsel pursuant to Section 21D of the Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (“PSLRA”). After reviewing the written and oral arguments of the parties, as well as the applicable law, it is the opinion of the Court that the Motion should be GRANTED.

I. Background

Pres…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. John E. Johnson and H/w Ann Marie Johnson v. The Celotex Corporation, Owens-Illinois, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  4. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,265 Fred Zeidman and Steven Youngelson v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  5. Andrews v. Bechtel Power Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Constance Sczesny Trust v. KPMG LLPDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
  2. Philadelphia American Life Insurance Co. v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2004
  3. Tanne v. Autobytel, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2005
  4. Chauvin v. Chevron Oronite Co., LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2009
  5. Bates v. MeauxDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2020

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API