Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ball v. Yates

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided November 29, 1946Published

1Dissent

I think the rehearing should be granted. In the first appeal, Yates v. Ball, 132 Fla. 132, 181 So. 341, we held that the essential elements of the contract declared on were proven, that there was no material variance between allegata and probata, that there was ample showing of authority on the part of Ball's agent to act for him and that the issue when all evidence was in, was one for the jury to determine. In fine the law of the case was settled on the first appeal. Provident Life and Accident Insurance Co. v. Mathers, 157 Fla. 661, 26, So. (2) 814.

The rule in this state is that on a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Yates v. BallSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
  2. Family Loan Co. v. Smetal CorporationSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
  3. Southern Express Co. v. StovallSupreme Court of Florida · 1918
  4. Provident Life & Accident Insurance Co. of Chattanooga v. MathersSupreme Court of Florida · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API