Legal Opinion

Toyota Motor Corp. v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 27, 2011No. B225393PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1110Opinion

CROSKEY, J.

Defendants and petitioners Toyota Motor Corporation, Toyota Motor North America, Inc., and Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. (collectively, Toyota), seek a writ of mandate directing the trial court to vacate its order granting a motion to compel Toyota to produce five of its employees, who are Japanese residents, for deposition in California and to enter a new and different order denying that motion.. Code of Civil Procedure section 19891 provides that a nonresident of California is not obliged to attend as a witness in this state. After a careful review of the relevant…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Reid v. Google, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Hassan v. Mercy American River HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Ventura County Deputy Sheriffs' Ass'n v. Board of RetirementCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Jevne v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Schatz v. Allen Matkins Leck Gamble & Mallory LLPCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Haniff v. Superior Court of Santa Clara CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  2. County of Los Angeles v. Employee Relations Commission CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. I-CA Enterprises v. Palram AmericasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. Swisstex Direct v. Yarns America CA2/5California Court of Appeal · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API