Legal Opinion

Mooney v. Merriam

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 8, 1908No. 15,389PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from Wyandotte district court; J. McCabe Moore, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Porter, J.:

Robert T. Mooney and wife sued to recover damages for the breach of an alleged oral agreement to write an insurance policy covering property, consisting of a barn and certain live stock, grain and implements therein, situated on their farm in Wyandotte county. The defendants, Merriam, Ellis & Benton, are insurance agents at Kansas City, Kan,

*306Plaintiffs’ petition alleged that Willard Merriam had been in the insurance business for several years and that defendants succeeded to the business and were the agents of several fire-insurance…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ramspeck v. PattilloSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  2. Strohn v. Hartford Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Whitman v. Milwaukee Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Zimmermann v. Dwelling-House InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Wood v. Prussian National InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Rezac v. ZimaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  2. Marshel Investments, Inc. v. CohenCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1981
  3. Bridges v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Alma M. Epperson, Administratix of the Estate of Arthur R. Epperson, Deceased v. Connecticut Fire Insurance Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
  5. Harder v. ParkesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API