Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re the Estate of Ricks

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 14, 1966Published

1Dissent

Ughetta, J.,

dissents and votoes to reverse the decree, insofar as appealed from, with the following memorandum: As I read Matter of Park (15 N Y 2d 413) it is a direct holding that use of the word “ children ” creates no ambiguity even though there are adopted and natural children. “A testator or settlor must know that in the light of New York policy a foster child has exactly the same 'legal relation’ to the parent as a natural child. In the absence of an explicit purpose stated in the will * * * to exclude such a child, he must be deemed included” (Matter of Park, supra, p. 417). If the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re the Estate of RicksNew York Surrogate's Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API