Legal Opinion

State v. Savinskiy

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 1, 2019No. CC 121059 (SC S065257)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFlynn, J.

**464The state has petitioned for reconsideration of our decision in State v. Savinskiy , 364 Or. 802, 819, 441 P.3d 557 (2019), in which we concluded that the "Article I, section 11, right to counsel on pending charges does not guarantee that the state will provide notice to a defendant's attorney before questioning the defendant about a new, uncharged and ongoing conspiracy to harm witnesses to a pending prosecution." (Footnote omitted.) Based on that conclusion, we reversed in part the decision of the Court of Appeals, affirming the judgment of the trial court with respect to defendant's…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. SavinskiyOregon Supreme Court · 2019

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. CraigenOregon Supreme Court · 2023
  2. State v. KilbyOregon Supreme Court · 2025
  3. State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  4. State v. KilbyOregon Supreme Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API