Legal Opinion

McGonigle v. Whitehawk

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided April 10, 2007No. 3:05-cv-00162PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

RUSSELL, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Bertram Drilling, Inc.’s (“Bertram”) Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket # 13). The Plaintiffs, Bobbi McGonigle (“Mrs. McGonigle” or “McGonigle”) and Kyle McGonigle (“Mr.McGonigle”) have responded (Docket # 17), and Bertram has replied to that response (Docket # 33). This matter is now ripe for adjudication. For the following reasons, the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.

BACKGROUND

On the evening of November 23, 2004, at around midnight, co-Defendant Warren Whitehawk (“Whitehawk”) was…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  5. Steelvest, Inc. v. Scansteel Service Center, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Southard v. BelangerDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2013
  2. Diaz v. KelmDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2019
  3. Guthrie v. United States of America, Department of AgricultureDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2020
  4. Locke v. Swift Transportation Company of Arizona, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API