Legal Opinion
City of Hollywood v. Lombardi
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided August 5, 1999No. 98-3186PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
738 So.2d 491 (1999)
CITY OF HOLLYWOOD and Interrisk Concepts, Appellants/Cross-Appellees,
v.
Albert LOMBARDI, Appellee/Cross-Appellant.
No. 98-3186.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
August 5, 1999.
Scott J. Brook of Peters, Robertson, Parsons, Welcher, Mowers & Passaro, Fort Lauderdale, for Appellants/Cross-Appellees.
Richard A. Sicking, Coral Gables, for Appellee/Cross-Appellant.
ERVIN, J.
We are asked to address six issues in this workers' compensation case. The City of Hollywood and Interrisk Concepts, the employer and its servicing agent (E/ SA), assert that the judge of…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Barragan v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
- Escambia County Sheriff's Dept. v. GriceSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
- Brown v. SS Kresge Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1974
- Domutz v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1976
- Nikula v. Michigan Mut. Ins.Supreme Court of Florida · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- City of Hollywood v. LombardiSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- Villazano v. Horace Bell Honey Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Bethune v. NettlesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
- HRS v. PascualDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- Hernando County Sheriff's Office v. SikalosDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014