Legal Opinion

Deane v. Garniss

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 2, 1936PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.

The facts are agreed. The parties own and occupy adjoining improved parcels of land on Franklin Street in Melrose. The plaintiff applied to the fence viewers of Melrose to order a partition fence. The fence viewers, being duly appointed and sworn, notified and heard the parties, and on March 31,1932, ordered, directed and decreed “that a division line fence is necessary between the two premises to prevent trespassing and damaging the property of the petitioner by the respondent,” and that within twenty days the petitioner erect and maintain the southerly half of the fence and the respondent…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Bronson v. CoffinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  2. Rust v. LowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1809
  3. Louisville & Frankfort Railroad v. BallardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1859
  4. Lyons v. MerrickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  5. Quinn v. CrimmingsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Butman v. Fence Viewers of ChelseaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API