Legal Opinion

State v. Rome

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 30, 1978No. 60129PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

354 So.2d 504 (1978)

STATE of Louisiana, Respondent,

v.

David ROME, Defendant-Relator.

No. 60129.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 30, 1978.

Ronald P. Herman, Metairie, for defendant-relator.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., John M. Mamoulides, Dist. Atty., Abbott J. Reeves, Director, Research and Appeals Division, Asst. Dist. Atty., for respondent.

TATE, Justice.

The defendant is charged with possession of phencyclidine, La.R.S. 40:967, a felony. He moved to suppress the drug, claiming that it was the product of an illegal search of his vehicle following a stop…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. State v. JewellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
  3. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Miller v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
  2. State v. GoffWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. KillcreaseSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
  4. State v. BanksSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
  5. State v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API