Legal Opinion

Raymond Haislah v. Albert Walton and City of Cleveland and Cleveland Police Department

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 21, 1982No. 79-3440Published

1Opinion of the Court

676 F.2d 208

Raymond HAISLAH, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

Albert WALTON and City of Cleveland and Cleveland Police

Department, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 79-3440.

United States Court of Appeals,

Sixth Circuit.

Argued Feb. 13, 1982.

Decided April 21, 1982.

Roger D. Heller, Christopher D. Stanley, Cleveland, Ohio, for plaintiff-appellant.

John S. Polito, Donald F. Black, Cleveland, Ohio, for defendants-appellees.

Before EDWARDS, Chief Judge, and KENNEDY and JONES, Circuit Judges.

GEORGE CLIFTON EDWARDS, Jr., Chief Judge.

1

This appeal involves an action brought by plaintiff Raymond Haislah under 42 U.S.C. § 1983…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Wood v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Owen v. City of IndependenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API