Ziegel v. State

Appellant seeks review of the judgment and sentence imposed after the trial court revoked his probation. We affirm the revocation of probation. However, the trial court was required to find that Appellant had the ability to pay the ordered restitu*997tion before revoking his probation for nonpayment. See Stephens v. State, 630 So.2d 1090, 1091 (Fla.1994); Kimble v. State, 396 So.2d 815 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981) (citing Williams v. State, 365 So.2d 201 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978)). Additionally, the trial court failed to orally pronounce or enter a written order specifying the conditions of probation that were…