Legal Opinion
Huff v. House
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided August 22, 1983No. 4-882A254PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
YOUNG, Judge.
We originally dismissed this appeal because the trial court rendered summary judgment as to only one of several defendants and did not direct the entry of judgment as provided in Ind.Rules of Procedure, Trial Rule 56(C). On petition for rehearing, Huff contends that, even though the order she appeals was not final, we should exercise our authority under Ind.Rules of Procedure, Appellate Rule 4(E) and review the trial court's decision in this case. In support of this argument, Huff alleges that her claims against the remaining defendants have been…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Krueger v. BaileyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- First Equity Security Life Insurance Co. v. KeithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
- Parrett v. LebamoffIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- Highland Realty, Inc. v. Indianapolis Airport AuthorityIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- Ingmire v. ButtsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bueter v. BrinkmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- McCoy v. LikeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
- Parke v. First National Bank of ElkhartIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- Huff v. HouseIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983