Legal Opinion
In Re Christopher B.
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 7, 1978No. 16886PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] OPINION
Clifford and Katherine, natural parents of Christopher and Tammy, ages three and one-half years and 18 months, respectively, appeal from the order of the juvenile court declaring them to be dependent children of the court. They contend: (1) the Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule should be applied to Welfare and Institutions Code, section 300, dependency proceedings, and (2) the court, in finding the minors to be dependents of the court by a preponderance…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- See v. City of SeattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- In Re MartinezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Lake County Mental Health Department v. Susan T.California Supreme Court · 1994
- In Re Jamie M.California Court of Appeal · 1982
- In Re Jeannette v. MargeryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- In Re Mary S.California Court of Appeal · 1986
- In Re Nicole B.California Court of Appeal · 1979
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.