Legal Opinion

Groh v. Flammer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 15, 1903PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff, Julia A. Groh, individually and as executrix, etc., of John Groh3 deceased, from an interlocutory judgment óf the Supreme Court in favor of the defendant, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 2d day of June, 1903, upon the decision of the court, rendered after a trial at the New York Special Term, sustaining the defendant’s demurrer to the plaintiff’s complaint.

1Opinion of the Court

Hatch, J.:

The plaintiff brings this action individually and as executrix of the last will and testament of John Groh, deceased. The complaint in substance avers that the plaintiff Julia A. Groh and her husband were partners in a brewery business; the death of the *29husband, and the succession to the partnership of her two sons, Michael and John ; the death in 1896 of the son Michael, and the continuance of the business by the surviving partners; the subsequent transfer of the same to a corporation organized for the purpose of taking over the property and conducting the business; the issue of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bradley v. . BradleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  2. Arkenburgh v. WigginsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Groh v. FlammerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  2. Fonda v. Village of Sharon SpringsNew York Supreme Court · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API