Legal Opinion
People v. Robinson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 8, 1996PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum: Defendant forfeited any challenge to the adequacy of the People’s CPL 710.30 notice when, instead of moving to preclude, he moved for suppression and Supreme Court, after a Huntley hearing, refused to suppress (see, People v Jackson, 200 AD2d 856, 858, lv denied 83 NY2d 872). In any event, review of that issue is precluded by defendant’s failure to include the CPL 710.30 notice in the stipulated record (see, People v Velez, 223 AD2d 414; People v Calderon, 223 AD2d 380; People v Peak, 214 AD2d 1012, lv denied 86 NY2d 800). The testimony of a police witness that defendant made oral…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. JacksonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- People v. VelezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- People v. PeakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- People v. CalderonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. RodriguezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- People v. BrooksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- GRAHAM, CLIFFORD, PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. GrahamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. GrahamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013