Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Collins v. Director of Revenue

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 7, 2013No. WD 75214Published

1Concurrence

GARY D. WITT, Judge.

I concur in the result and analysis of the Majority opinion. I write separately to emphasize the importance of the fifteen-minute observation period in reaching a scientifically reliable result on the breathalyzer test and to suggest that it may be time for the Missouri breath alcohol testing program protocols to be updated to comply with the standards in the industry.

The breathalyzer test is a scientific instrument designed to produce as accurate of a result as possible when used properly. As with any scientific instrument, there are necessary protocols for its proper…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Carr v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Hurt v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATEMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API