Legal Opinion
Smith v. Temple
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided August 24, 1967No. File 10371PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HANSON, Judge.
Plaintiff appealed from orders dismissing his complaint on jurisdictional grounds. After perfecting his appeal plaintiff died and defendants moved for summary affirmance. However, on June 2, 1967, this court allowed Michael V. Smith, as special administrator of the Estate of Ambrose Hunter, to be substituted as party plaintiff. The order allowing substitution disposed of defendants' pending motion.
The appeal presents the important and perplexing question of whether or not the Circuit Court has jurisdiction of an action by one Indian against other Indians for damages resulting…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Worcester v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
- Williams v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Donnelly v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. CandelariaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Weeks Construction, Inc. v. Oglala Sioux Housing Authority, United States of America, and Department of Housing and Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- State Ex Rel. Bear v. District Court of the Fifteenth Judicial District Ex Rel. County of RooseveltMontana Supreme Court · 1973
- White v. CalifanoDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1977
- Annis v. Dewey County BankDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1971
- Clarence Ernest Beardslee, A/K/A Clarence Everett Beardslee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.