Floyd v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
LEMONS, Judge.
Elmer K. Floyd was convicted in a bench trial of robbery of Annette Keats in violation of Code § 18.2-58, abducting Annette Keats for pecuniary benefit in violation of Code § 18.2-48, and maliciously causing bodily injury to Annette Keats with a caustic substance in violation of Code § 18.2-52. On appeal, Floyd challenges the sufficiency of the evidence for each of his convictions. Finding no error, we affirm the convictions.
I. BACKGROUND
Where the sufficiency of the evidence is an issue on appeal, an appellate court must view the evidence and all reasonable inferences fairly…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cheng v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1990
- People v. HicksIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
- George v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1991
- Bishop v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
- Cameron v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Corado v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2005
- Mohamed Soleiman Mustamandi v. Commonwealth of VACourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2000
- Sheila Juanita Somerville, s/k/a Shelia J. Somerville v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2015
- Terry Darnell Chism v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2002