Draper v. Washington
Supreme Court of the United States
1Dissent
Mr. Justice White,
whom Me. Justice Clark, Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice Stewart join, dissenting.
The Supreme Court of Washington in this case determined that the issues raised by petitioners in that court were without merit and frivolous. In my judgment petitioners were afforded an adequate appellate review upon a satisfactory record. Consequently, with all due deference, I dissent.
I
The Court, as it should, Griffin v. Illinois, 351 U. S. 12, 20; Eskridge v. Washington State Board, 357 U. S. 214, 216; cf. Johnson v. United States, 352 U. S. 565; Coppedge v. United States, 369 U. S. 438,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Gunning v. CooleySupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Galloway v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Eskridge v. Washington State Board of Prison Terms & ParolesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.