Legal Opinion

Miller v. Miller

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1871Published

Action for partition. John H. Miller brought this action against Ann E. Miller and others (Ann being his wife), for a partition of land.

1Opinion of the CourtMurray, J.

This case was submitted to me at special term, upon the pleadings. In the complaint it is alleged that Ann E. Miller is the wife of the plaintiff; that they were seized in fee as tenants in common of the premises described therein. That each is the owner of one undivided half thereof. That they obtained title by deed from one Daniel Lewis, dated September 1, 1867. That this was the only real estate within the State, owned in common by them. That the purchase price of said land was four hundred dollars. That the said Daniel Lewis gave the said Ann E. Miller one half thereof. That the other…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jackson ex dem. Suffern v. McConnellNew York Supreme Court · 1838
  2. Barber v. HarrisNew York Supreme Court · 1836
  3. Wright v. . SaddlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  4. In re SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1819
  5. Doe ex dem. De Peyster v. HowlandNew York Supreme Court · 1828

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API