Legal Opinion

Proteotech, Inc. v. Unicity International, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided March 19, 2008No. C06-1297ZPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

THOMAS S. ZILLY, District Judge.

THIS MATTER came before the Court on cross-motions for partial summary judgment brought by plaintiff, ProteoTech, Inc. (“ProteoTech”), and defendant / third-party defendant, Rexall Sundown, Inc. (“Rexall”). The Court heard oral argument on the motions and issued a separate Minute Order denying both motions due to the existence of genuine issues of material fact. The Court now enters the following order to address a legal issue raised in the motions. For the reasons discussed herein, the Court HOLDS, as a matter of law, that an exclusive patent licensee may…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dawson Chemical Co. v. Rohm & Haas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Oliver v. Rumford Chemical WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. Moraine Products v. Ici America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
  4. In Re HernandezUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · 2002
  5. In Re Aerobox Composite Structures, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API