Legal Opinion
Maidman v. Rose
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided November 23, 1925PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSanderson, J.
This is an action of tort for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff while riding in the automobile of one Iveson, in Fall River.
The plaintiff entered the Iveson car at the invitation of its driver, to show him the way to the center of the city, and before the accident happened had ridden westerly, on the *595right hand side of Bedford Street, a few blocks toward the point where Twelfth Street enters it from the south. At the same time a truck owned by the defendant’s intestate was approaching Bedford Street on Twelfth Street, and an automobile, operated by one Hebert, moving in an easterly…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Shultz v. Old Colony Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Lambert v. Eastern Massachusetts Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- Bullard v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Kellogg v. TompsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
- Lawrence v. Fitchburg & Leominster Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Marsh v. BeraldiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
- Donnelly v. LarkinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
- Bessey v. SalemmeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Pappathanos v. CoakleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
- Monaghan v. Keith Oil Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.