Legal Opinion

Graham v. Central of Georgia Ry. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 17, 1928No. 6 Div. 114PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, C. J.

It is unquestionably settled by the decisions of this court, that, notwithstanding the wife must sue for personal injuries to herself, the husband may maintain an action for compensatory damages, not for the injury, but resulting therefrom, such as the loss of her services or society, the cost of nursing and caring for her, etc. People’s Home Tel. Co. v. Cockrum, 182 Ala. 549, 62 So. 86; Birmingham Southern R. Co. v. Lintner, 141 Ala. 420, 38 So. 363, 109 Am. St. Rep. 40, 3 Ann. Cas. 461; Southern Ry. Co. v. Crowder, 135 Ala. 417, 33 So. 335; Morrison v. Clark, 196 Ala. 670, 72 So. 305. This…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hyatt v. AdamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Morrison v. ClarkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  3. Birmingham Southern Railway Co. v. LintnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
  4. Southern Railway Co. v. CrowderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902
  5. People's Home Tel. Co. v. CockrumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hoekstra v. HelgelandSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Mattison v. KirkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  3. Ledger v. TippittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. Atlanta Life Insurance Company v. StanleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
  5. Price v. Southern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API