Legal Opinion

Holland v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 1, 2015No. CR-14-1019PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCourtney Hudson Goodson, Associate Justice

LA jury in the Pulaski County Circuit Court found appellant Andrew M. Holland guilty of sexual assault in the first degree and sexual assault in The second degree. Respectively, he received concurrent terms of forty and thirty years in prison. For reversal, Holland contends that the circuit court erred by (1) permitting the introduction of evidence under the “pedophile exception”; (2) by not allowing evidence of the victims’ motives to falsely accuse him of the crimes; and (3) by denying him access to one of the victim’s psychological records. We affirm on all issues.

Factual Background

By an…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Delaware v. FenstererSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Jaffee v. RedmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Vance v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2011

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hortenberry v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2017
  2. Shreck v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2017
  3. Baumann v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018
  4. Gildehaus v. Arkansas Alcoholic Beverage Control BoardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016
  5. Tracy Will Vaughn v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2020

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API