Legal Opinion · Dissent

Addy v. Professional Business Owners Ass'n Workers' Compensation Fund

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided June 7, 2002No. 2001030Published

1DissentPittman, Judge

I conclude that the trial court’s judgment finding that Add/s shooting death was not a work-related injury is supported by substantial evidence; therefore, I dissent.

The dependents and the employer submitted the ease to the trial court on a stipulation of facts (contained in various evidentiary submissions by both parties) and further stipulated that the only issue for the trial court to decide was whether the employee’s death occurred in the line and scope of her employment. As stated above, the trial court held that the employee’s death did not occur in the line and scope of her employment.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tiger Motor Company v. WinslettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
  2. Thompson v. Anserall, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1988
  3. McGaughy v. Allied Products Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  4. Beverly v. Ruth's Chris Steak HouseCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API