Legal Opinion
Dobyns v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided June 9, 2016No. 08-700CPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Fraud Upon the Court; Fraud by an Opposing Party; Relief from Judgment; RCFC 60; RCFC 63(f); Remand Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 12.1
PATRICIA CAMPBELL-SMITH, Chief Judge
OPINION AND ORDER
This matter is before the court on remand. Pursuant to Rule 60 of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC), plaintiff filed a motion seeking relief from judgment (Rule 60 Motion) alleging that defendant, through its counsel, had committed fraud on the court. By appointment, a special master gathered evidence to assist the court in determining whether such fraud had occurred. After discovery…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Martha Ann Brundage Rozier v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- John Demjanjuk v. Joseph PetrovskyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- H. K. Porter Company, Inc., Cross-Appellant v. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
- Theodore R. Kupferman, as Receiver of Vickers, Christy & Co., Inc. v. Consolidated Research and Manufacturing Corporation, Daniel JacobsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- HAZLEHURST v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICESUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025
- In re: Jason Rudolph Stanford; Jason Stanford d/b/a Rollin Smoke at the Attache v. Stephen SatherUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2026