Legal Opinion

Richardson v. Huitt

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 1, 1964No. 5-3296PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sam Robinson, Associate Justice.

Appellant, Clifton Richardson, and appellee, Mark Wilson Huitt, age 40, are friends and neighbors. Huitt had a small tomato patch in Richardson’s back yard. They live in Warren, where Huitt is a member of the police department. Richardson has two pecan trees in his yard. In November, 1962, he asked Huitt to thrash one of the trees and offered to pay him for doing it. Huitt agreed, and a few days later went over to Richardson’s place for that purpose. Mrs. Richardson advised Huitt not to climb the tree; the men, however, did not agree with her. Richardson…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Grayson-McLeod Lumber Co. v. CarterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  2. Gans Salvage Co. v. Byrnes.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1905
  3. Walther v. CooleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rhoads v. Service MacHine CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1971
  2. Phillip Layton v. United States of America, Reba J. Richardson, Administratrix of the Estate of Ronnie Richardson, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API