Legal Opinion
Houlihan v. Morrison Knudsen Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 8, 2003PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*494In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hall, J.), dated February 7, 2002, as granted that branch of the defendant’s motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the cause of action sounding in strict products liability.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The plaintiff, a subway conductor employed by the New York City Transit Authority (hereinafter the TA), was injured on the job when he lost his balance on a moving…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Amatulli v. Delhi Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Aghabi v. SebroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Billordo v. E.P. Realty AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Beckles v. General Electric Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Santana v. Seagrave Fire Apparatus Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
3Cited by4 opinions
- Linda Thompson and Roy Hedbert v. Hirano Tecseed Company, Ltd. v. Sheldahl, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- Herrod v. Metal Powder ProductsDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2012
- Linda Thompson v. Hirano Tecseed Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- Thompson v. Hirano Tecseed Co., Ltd.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2005