Legal Opinion

Thornton v. Kingrey

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1916No. 18914PublishedCited by 1 opinion

' Appeal from the district court for Scotts Bluff county: Ralph W. Hobart, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtHamer, J.

Appeal from the judgment of the district court for Scotts Bluff county. There is not much, if any, dispute about the facts. The Gering irrigation district is the owner of a canal by means of which it supplies water to the lands within the said district. The canal which it owns runs west of the village- of Gering. The plaintiff and appellant, Henry M. Thornton, owns a tract of land in the eastern part of the village of Gering, and his land is also embraced in the Gering irrigation district, of which it is a part. This land has for several years past been used solely for agricultural purposes.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. City of Denver v. MullenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1884
  3. Platte & Denver C. & M. Co. v. DowellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1892
  4. City of Nampa v. Nampa & Meridian Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Gregsten v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1893

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Thornton v. KingreyNebraska Supreme Court · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API