Lovins v. Napier

I respectfully dissent and would emphasize that the negligence, if any, of which *923the truck driver is accused consisted of his being on the wrong side of the road at the time of the collision. The tire marks of both vehicles disclose that the Lovins’ vehicle was itself on the wrong side of the road at the place of collision. The eviden-tiary value of Lovin’s inconsistent testimony and arguments is destroyed by the pure evidence to the contrary. In fact, considering that her car moved forward after the impact, it appears inherently impossible for the accident to have occurred as the driver…