Legal Opinion

Kuykendall v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 3, 1930No. 12987Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

Appellant has requested leave to file a second motion for rehearing in which our attention is directed to the Lane case, (Texas Crim. App.), 45 S.W. 693. This was an earlier case than any of those mentioned and analyzed in our opinion on rehearing. It was not referred to in any of them. We would be inclined to follow the Clements case, 43 Tex.Crim. Rep.,66 S.W. 301, it being later than the Lane case, if they are thought to be in conflict, for the reason that the exact point now before us was evidently given more consideration in the Clements case.

Appellant calls our attention to an oversight…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Clements v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API